stewart2014
New member
Hi fellow reactive dog guardians,
I am curious as to what this community prefers in general, the BAT technique or doing the engage-disengage game. From my understanding, BAT is more of a 'philosophy' where you let the dog explore on their own and make the decisions. On the other hand, engage-disengage tells your dog exactly what you want from them but still giving them the choice whether or not they participate in it.
My doggo, an almost 2 y/o bullmastiff mix (3 months into rescuing him) is a leash reactive boy, stemming from frustration (I think.) He barks at all dogs on walks, however the bark can either be his 'scary' bark or 'whiney' bark. Each time his hair puffs out along his back down to his tail. He is great off leash and loves dogs otherwise. Is moderate when walking with other dogs he knows (won't bark at them but gets v excited and wants to play.)
I want to go to a dog park and sit outside of it with him and do the engage-disengage game. All of our dog friends are all reactive to a degree or old/stressed out by the commotion so we can't use them for set ups because I wouldn't want to put them in that stressful situation just to try and help our doggo. I've put it off because I am an overthinker and don't want to mess it up right from the get go, so of course now I've just procrastinated and feel bad that I haven't already started it.
I only recently looked into BAT, because I am detail obsessed, and now I'm trying to decide what method to start with. Can I still use BAT if my only set up are the dogs at the dog park? I don't mind using treats for engage-disengage, but it's nice to think about that I wouldn't necessarily have to rely on them for BAT.
What do you guys think? Anyone tried both? Together or separately?
Helped a stressed dog mother out, who is trying to be less stressed for my doggos sake! Thanks!
I am curious as to what this community prefers in general, the BAT technique or doing the engage-disengage game. From my understanding, BAT is more of a 'philosophy' where you let the dog explore on their own and make the decisions. On the other hand, engage-disengage tells your dog exactly what you want from them but still giving them the choice whether or not they participate in it.
My doggo, an almost 2 y/o bullmastiff mix (3 months into rescuing him) is a leash reactive boy, stemming from frustration (I think.) He barks at all dogs on walks, however the bark can either be his 'scary' bark or 'whiney' bark. Each time his hair puffs out along his back down to his tail. He is great off leash and loves dogs otherwise. Is moderate when walking with other dogs he knows (won't bark at them but gets v excited and wants to play.)
I want to go to a dog park and sit outside of it with him and do the engage-disengage game. All of our dog friends are all reactive to a degree or old/stressed out by the commotion so we can't use them for set ups because I wouldn't want to put them in that stressful situation just to try and help our doggo. I've put it off because I am an overthinker and don't want to mess it up right from the get go, so of course now I've just procrastinated and feel bad that I haven't already started it.
I only recently looked into BAT, because I am detail obsessed, and now I'm trying to decide what method to start with. Can I still use BAT if my only set up are the dogs at the dog park? I don't mind using treats for engage-disengage, but it's nice to think about that I wouldn't necessarily have to rely on them for BAT.
What do you guys think? Anyone tried both? Together or separately?
Helped a stressed dog mother out, who is trying to be less stressed for my doggos sake! Thanks!